Cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801

At first glance, it looks like Cambridge may have been a little over-ambitious with the price. It looks and feels a step above its rivals, though once again that price rise takes the shine off a little. There are plenty of detail changes between the two generations of CXA amplifiers. Cambridge has also courted the home install market with the addition of a RS port and trigger inputs that help to integrate the CXA61 into an automated system.

Looking at the specifications, it would be easy to assume that little had changed on the analogue side. This integrated still has four line-level stereo RCA inputs on the back and a 3. While still recognisably related to the older amp, this new one sounds more transparent and playful. It has enough in the way of scale and authority to work well with the Gladiator OST. It has a nicely judged tonal balance that walks that delicate path between attack and refinement.

This is the kind of presentation that works well across a wide range of speakers and musical genres. Stereo imaging is impressive, with the amp able to place sounds and instruments with precision and stability. Once we spend a decent amount of time listening, it becomes clear that few rivals have the resolution to challenge the CXA It digs up low level details with ease and renders them with care and conviction.

This is made clear when we listen to the Olafur Arnalds set, which relies on the system having a high degree of subtlety.

2+c [email protected] defdggf> h i 8! 8 j ! k !! 8 hll $ii 8 ! m 8

Instead it is confident and composed, but never overplays its hand. However, it is better equipped and clearly sounds superior to the last model.

Just as importantly, it justifies the price premium over rivals such as the Audiolab A and Rega Brio by delivering a combination of sonic ability, features and build quality even those fine amps struggle to match. Best stereo amplifiers Read our Audiolab A review.

cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801

Read our Rega Brio review. What Hi-Fi? Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer. Home Reviews. For Open, detailed and dynamic sound Punchy and exciting presentation Good feature list Excellent build and finish.I am putting together my first stereo 2.

Warm sound profile seem to match what I listen to and hence these two choices.

Korg 01 w vst

Anyone have experience listening to them both? Any recommendations? Much appreciated. For a 2. My go-to two channel solution are the slim line Marantz AVRs: effective bass management, pre outs for L and R to accommodate external amps probably never need more power, but you can, as well as having the option to throw a tube amp in the mix. I understand that it is not the same as AVRs dedicated bass management. I don't plan to watch a lot of movies in the living room have a small media room with 5.

Yeah, that's one thing where I think NAD and others are dropping the ball. Subs are ubiquitous these days, and the benefits of bass management are quite real. Two channel kit should really be designed to meet the needs of today, not I wonder if Klipsch has it in their otherwise interesting, fancy new integrated amp Too bad Klipsch's new integrated hasn't hit the shelves yet, it looks like it would compete with the NAD and Cambridge.

Anywho, take that as a rant against what the industry offers us, not an indictment of those particular products, which I don't know much about. A cursory glance shows that NAD to be one of their newer models using the Hypex n-core amps, which they seem to be switching over to across the board. I think that Klipsch is using the same in their new amp, too, but not certain. Either would probably work just fine.

Of course, all are subject to interpretation. My family room HT setup consists of a little of both. Back to topic, i would hold on with the new NAD classics until they get some reviews. They are not Ncore but the cheaper Ucd and furthermore some kind of hybrid of that. I haven't heard them yet but i ain't holding my breath:p. You could however propably save a bit of coin and get the NAD C It is an older design but sounds great and you might just find it for sale as they are changing them out with the new ones.

Come eseguire lo scan disk? [archivio]

I have the NAD c and am very happy with it. I have never had a chance to listen to the other model you are considering but as for me it works really well for my bedroom setup. The c does have rca outs so you can hook it up to a subwoofer or if feel like you need the extra power you can use it as a preamp as well. Honestly the only thing I dislike about it is the plastic "cheap feeling"of the faceplate and volume nob other than that I do recommend the product especially when you add the BluOs module.

If you're in the same position, you are also looking for:. That last point is the difference between the CXA60 and the 80 other than power.Discussion in ' Audio Hardware ' started by nola27Dec 15, Log in or Sign up. Steve Hoffman Music Forums. Location: texas. Iv'e pretty much read everything I could on the net about these integrated amps but was wondering if anyone has had a chance to hear these side by side.

Усилитель и цифровой аудиопроигрыватель Cambridge Audio CXA80 / CXN

I already have that covered. I'm just a 2 channel man and listen to cd's and streaming music only. Location: Twin Peaks, WA. Sorry, I haven't heard the Marantz, but I can vouch for the the Yamaha integrateds - very fine pieces of equipment. Curious to hear the responses as well since I am debating between these choices as well for a 2nd system to be used with a pair of Mirage OM-8 omnipolar speakers.

HershiserDec 15, Location: Annapolis. Location: U. HelomDec 15, Location: USA. I've had recent integrated amps from both manufacturers, and have stuck with Yamaha. Since you don't need a DAC I assume you're really looking at thenot the ?

How much is 925 cz worth

You really have to listen t0 both for yourself. Can't you buy them both and return one? Even if you're buying online the return shipping charge might be worth the hit for peace of mind. Just consider it a rental fee! LebowskiDec 15, Fritz Fernow likes this. Location: Sofia, Bulgaria. I have only heard Yamaha AS the previous model vs Marantz PM, and there was no comparison - the was definitely higher level.

Yamaha AS801, Yamaha RN803 or Outlaw RR2160

Location: B. I had the AS and found it sterile. I now have a PM and really like it. Location: Pacific Beach, CA. When I called Crutchfield I was looking at these two models.

cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801

They recommended the A-s saying it was a standout in the price range. Neutral sound with tight snappy satisfying bass. I've been thrilled with my Yamaha and can't recommend it highly enough for the cost. Since you don't need a DAC I'd say the is the choice.

Robert CRolltidebluemooze and 7 others like this. Location: Scottish Borders. Bill Mac likes this. Location: Brisbane Australia.For me, the award-winning Yamaha A-S was something of an eye opener. While my previous amps and systems had given me many, many hours of enjoyment, it was my A-S that inspired me to build my first serious hi-fi system — a system in which cables mattered, a proper rack replaced the usual stacks of gear, and the speakers are taken down from the walls and positioned for true stereo sound.

Fast forward a couple of years, and the A-S moved onto a new home, and was replaced. Naturally, when Yamaha announced a successor to the A-S, the A-S, I jumped at the chance to check one out and asked for a review sample. However, the A-S aims to bring the previously all-analogue A-S into the modern digital age, incorporating a built-ing DAC in place of the previous iPod dock connection. The power output of 85W per channel into 8 ohms remains from the previous model, as does the impedance selector — which adjusts the amps power supply to provide more power for low-impedance speakers.

That power supply includes a custom power transformer and 2 custom-made UF block capacitors. The A-S features separate power supplies for the analogue and digital sections. In edition, the chassis incorporates ART Anti-Resonance and tough technology, including a solid base and supporting central bar to minimise the effect of vibration on the sensitive electronic components.

The amp, wrapped in a foam-like cloth material, sits inside a strong box held in place by thin blocks of polystyrene. Weighing in at roughly It feels solid, too — with no flexing as you move it around.

That top cover, with its huge cooling vents is supported by the internal central bar, denoted by the top screw near the front panel. It keeps the cover firmly in place and reduces resonance — the enclosure emitting only dull thuds when tapped.

The vents are also most effective — the A-S remaining cool to the touch even when pushed hard with difficult speakers. The front is distinctly Yamaha. To the right, the large textured volume control dominates much of the end of the front panel, accompanied by a smaller but similarly designed rotary dial for source selection.

LEDs surround the source selection dial, illuminating the currently selected source — while the pure direct switch sits discretely beneath the 2 controls. That volume control is motorised, allowing you to operate it from the remote control. In the middle, 4 large vertical dials offer controls for bass, treble, balance and variable loudness.

To the left sit a power button, an IR receiver, a headphone jack and a speaker selector, allowing you to switch between the 2 pairs of output terminals. The A-S supports bi-wiring or the ability to run 2 pairs of speakers. If used in this configuration, each pair must be 8 ohms or higher. The record selector found on the previous A-S is no-longer present — and is a disappointing omission, as it was a feature i used often.Deals Amazon deals Bargain threads Classified adverts.

Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. What's new New posts Latest activity. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled.

For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. KWB1 Well-known Member. BlueWizard Distinguished Member. Are you in the UK or EU? It is a little unclear what you mean by better. It does not have a PHONO input, but that can easily be added as an external device for a reasonable price, should having a turntable be of interest to you. The Y amaha AS is the top of the consumer line of Amps.

To move up one model from there is a Substantial jump in price. There are other external DAC options, but for the moment, I'm just illustrating the point.

Adding an external DAC is easy enough and reasonably priced. Last edited: Jun 12, BlueWizard said:. Pre-Amp Outs can be used for a Subwoofer, unfortunately Subwoofer outs can't be used as a pre-amp.

That's the one thing that would have made the AS a near prefect amp, if they had only included Pre-Amp Outs. Many will claim you don't need that as bass is generally mono anyway.

But I would personally rather make that decision myself, rather than have it forced on me. You should do fine with the Cambridge CXA80, very nice amp.

Paulx Distinguished Member. I think you'll find the Cambridge quite admirable. It's very important for dynamic swings in music and films.

And the CA has buckets of the stuff. The properly powered differences between the quieter and louder passages of music are a lot of what accurate reproduction is. You must log in or register to reply here. Similar threads. Cambridge audio cxn plus w or cxa80 Started by Ptrmkndry Mar 22, Replies: 3. Started by gonchi Mar 11, Replies: 9. Top Bottom.Discussion in ' Audio Hardware ' started by Slimwhit33Oct 10, Log in or Sign up. Steve Hoffman Music Forums. What should I upgrade first?

Location: Orange County NY. In the last 6 months, I have set up a music listening room in my house, and started to put together a dedicated system for that sole purpose. I used a leftover AV Receiver to start. I listen to mostly vinyl, but have now also mixed in CD's. I have been looking at either 2 channel receivers or integrated amps, because to me that seems like the logical thing to change first.

But figured you all might have some ideas for me. Slimwhit33Oct 10, Location: Ohio. Yes, as a long time denon avr user I would say that is an excellent place to start. Upgrading from Polk bookshelves to some floor standers would also be a a very big deal. On your current list I would go marantz and Elac. DennisOct 10, Clonesteak and Slimwhit33 like this. Location: Montana. Depending on what you are currently using. Good interconnects, speaker wire and some decent power cables where applicable will go a long way.

GuitardedOct 10, Thanks for the insight! If you could only do one of those, either the Matantz integrated or the Elac speakers? I do have quality cords and interconnects.

Guitarded likes this. Friends who have the Elac Bookshelfs swear by them and I would trust them though, I haven't listened to the F6.

cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801

If you are happy with the sound of the Denon Amp, then I would look at speakers. Those seem to be the most obvious upgrade in your system. Prior to that I was running the equivalent Monitors I would imagine those Elacs would elicit a similar result. Slimwhit33 likes this. Location: london. The speakers are great A graded by stereophile and look also very nice. Before buying any speakers please go and tedt some speakers in your price range each of us have a different idea of what good sounds like so very personal.

Cambridge Audio CXA61 review

Villorejo81Oct 10, Location: Kalamazoo, MI. ClonesteakOct 10, The Cambridge CXA80 has all the hallmarks of a world-class performer. The CXA80 should follow in a similar vein.

Telus rcs oneplus

It has the sleek, modern look of the CX series, and is just a step higher in price and specifications from its successful sibling, the CXA The main differences? The biggest difference, however, is sound. What astounds us with the CXA80 is just how detailed and tangible it makes music sound. Each strum is satisfyingly solid, and packed with weight.

3d sculpting app

The sound is so clean, so clear. You get a proper sense that these are real, three-dimensional instruments being played. You can feel the pluck of strings, and the low basslines rumble on with layers and layers of texture and depth.

It's not just the detail; it's also the new found muscle and power that drives the sound of the CXA Compared with the CXA60the bigger sibling is, well, bigger. In every way.

cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801

The scale is large and grand, with songs given ample space to place each element in the mix. That's why you'll find instruments and voices achieving the kind of solidity that you only get in high-end hi-fi separates.

Cambridge CXA80 review

But with all that power comes a cost. For even as the CXA80 impresses us, that added muscle gets ponderous and weighs down the rhythm and dynamics. Both singers have a similar tone through the CXA80, whereas the difference between the male and female vocals is obvious through the more expressive A The emphasis on the end of syllables — the drawing out of certain words — is subtly conveyed through the A Nor does it have the nimble-footed rhythm to express the sprightly, poppy nature of the song.

Along with the pair of balanced XLR inputs and 3. There are also three other digital inputs: one coaxial, two optical, and they can all handle hi-res. We also like that Cambridge has continued its tradition of labelling all connections in both orientations, meaning you can easily read the input names when leaning over the amp.

The Cambridge amplifiers are designed to keep the left and right channels as separate from each other as possible, and the CXA80 takes this one step further by having separate transformer taps for left and right channels instead of a single one as found on the CXA On the outside, the CXA80 is a gorgeous modern design. The floating design and brushed aluminium finish in silver or black looks sleek and classy. Every part of the Cambridge amp — from the front panel buttons, the smooth curved edges of the chassis, the input names lighting up in blue — is exquisitely detailed.

It feels every inch a quality product. MORE: The best stereo amplifiers of the 21st century. It performs just as admirably, too. All the buttons click satisfyingly, the rotary volume dial has the perfect amount of resistance, and even the tonal controls indicated by the bass and treble clef icons feel lovely to use.

The only visible difference from the CXA60 is that when selecting the USB input, the icon goes red instead of dark blue like the other inputs.


thoughts on “Cambridge audio cxa80 vs yamaha as 801”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *